The Seedlings To Stars 2012 Top 100 Prospects, #68: Cheslor Cuthbert

by Lists/Rankings

Name: Cheslor Cuthbert
DOB: 11/16/92
Organization: Royals
Position: Third base
Notable 2011 Stats: .267/.345/.397 with 13 2B, 1 3B, 8 HR, 65/36 K/BB, and 2-for-2 SB in 81 games with Kane County (A)

Why He’s This High: At the tender age of 18, Cuthbert held his own in full-season ball, displaying a good approach at the plate and a bit of pop. He was hitting .328/.381/.500 through the end of July, dominating the level, until a late-season slump slowed him, so he looks even better than the numbers suggest.

A Nicaragua native, Cuthbert is a projectable hitter who should grow into well-above-average power as he matures, and many have projected him to be an annual 25-HR hitter if not better. His selective approach at the plate should allow him to see lots of good pitches to hit.

Defensively, he’s not as raw as most third basemen his age, and projects to hold the position down. There’s some question as to what sort of athleticism he’ll have once he fills out, but such a loss of athleticism would probably render him a merely playable third baseman rather than a player who must move across the diamond.

Why He’s This Low: We shouldn’t go crazy about three months of performance in Low-A at age 18–just look at the relatively middling performance of Jonathan Singleton since mid-2010 for evidence of that. Cuthbert obviously still needs to show that he can play at a good level for more than 50 games at a time, let alone 100 or 150.

The power’s going to need to come, of course, for Cuthbert to truly become a star, as average defensive third basemen need to do more than just walk half as often as they strike out to be impact players. At his age and level of experience, a good portion of his value lies in future projection more than current talent level (although, of course, he’s more advanced than most his age), and he’s thus got a long way to go. And if he does bulk up to the point where he’s a big power threat, how much of his defensive ability will be compromised?

None of this diminishes Cuthbert’s future possibilities in any way–we should just be a bit cautious about a corner guy with a career .740 OPS in the low minors.

Conclusions: There’s certainly a lot to get excited about here, as Cuthbert could be the player who ultimately pushes Mike Moustakas to DH (in the post-Billy Butler era) in Kansas City. He’s very polished for his age and also offers good future projection, and he could be a truly fearsome offensive force who isn’t a complete zero defensively.

However, Cuthbert is a long way off from those heights, and we should remember that. Like most players of this type, he could become one of baseball’s top prospects with a big 2012. The key for the third baseman going forward is going to be adding power while maintaining his strikeout-to-walk ratio–if he can have a full season at his pre-August 2011 levels, watch out.

Check out all of the Seedlings To Stars 2012 Top 100 Prospects here!

For more on the Royals, check out Kings of Kauffman!

Follow us on Twitter: Nathaniel (@stoltz_baseball), Wally (@thebaseballfish), James (@JAYRC_MCB) and Joe (@ReleasePoints). You can also keep up to date with all things S2S by following the site on Twitter (@Seedlings2Stars) or liking our Facebook page.

You can follow us on Twitter @Seedlings2Stars and you can also keep up to date with all things S2S by liking our Facebook page.

Tags: , ,

Comments
Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest
oldbarn98 5 pts

In the post Billy Butler era...love it! Cheslor has star potential written all over him. Really quick stroke that barrels the ball. Anxious to see what he does next year. Nice aggressive ranking.

NathanielStoltz 7 pts

oldbarn98 You'd consider this an aggressive ranking? Not sure if or where he's showed up on other top 100 lists, but I'd think consensus is that he's somewhere in the middle half of the top 100 at this point. Of course, the next ten or so on the list AFTER this one are where I start to get truly aggressive, but I'll just let that unfold :).

And yeah, it's hard not to like Cuthbert. His emergence was a big reason that I still think KC has a top-10, possibly top-5 farm system.

oldbarn98 5 pts

NathanielStoltz Fair Point. I have him at 55 on my Top 100. He only made one mid-season Top 50 list as well. I'm very bullish on Cuthbert as you can tell. So, I guess I should say...man, why do you have him ranked so low? LOL. Whether it's 50 or 68, he's still really highly thought of. But, Steve Lombardozzi? I'm pretty speechless on that. Will comment when I can get my head around that one.

NathanielStoltz 7 pts

oldbarn98Yeah, no question Cuthbert is getting acclaim from all corners. I could easily see him fitting at 55; heck, I wouldn't find a 35-40 ranking ludicrous.

As for Lombardozzi...one of my bigger reaches, no doubt. An interesting thing about these writeups, though...I'll go into some of them (Lombardozzi's one example) thinking "Man, how am I going to justify this? Did I just take a mental break when ranking this guy?" and then by the time I finish the writeup I'll be pretty convinced I made the right decision.

But by all means...for some of these ones where I'm way out of line compared to most of the mainstream, I'd love to hear what it is exactly that I'm missing--am I just downplaying a guy's weaknesses, overplaying his strengths, or just missing important information? I hope it's not the latter.